Engaging young doctors to help drive change
During the past two years Eastern Health has been implementing its No Unnecessary Tests (NUTS) program, which has strong alignment with the principles of Choosing Wisely Australia. The NUTS philosophy is that patients should receive investigations that will benefit clinical decision-making.
“Old doctors are hard to change. Young doctors are still flexible, and they can change and if you involve them in these culture change projects at the start, that will stay with them for life.”
- Dr. Paul Buntine
Dr. Paul Buntine, an Emergency Physician at Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, said engaging senior leaders in behaviour change projects is instrumental to their success, but so is engaging junior doctors who are making most of the day-to-day decisions in our hospitals.
Initial work focused on reducing unnecessary pathology tests in emergency departments at Box Hill, Maroondah and Angliss hospitals through:
- audits of existing ordering practices
- engagement of clinician and consumer focus groups
- interventions for sustainable change, such as education, soft stops in ordering processes and publicity in grand rounds and other staff engagement activities.
“The primary focus of these interventions was not to reduce test numbers, but to educate clinicians to think carefully about the clinical usefulness of the tests they were ordering,” Dr Buntine said.
“Despite this, results showed an average drop of more than 50% across five specific blood tests. Interestingly, early effort to rationalise venous blood gas ordering using decision flags wasn’t successful, so the project was handed to a mid-level registrar who presented audit results to their colleagues.”
“Our venous gases halved overnight by involving a junior doctor and giving them a leadership role. With this situation, it hit the nail on the head.”
Other projects have focused on reducing unnecessary imaging, specifically for chest X-rays in intensive care and for chest X-rays and suspected pulmonary embolism in emergency.
Dr Buntine said imaging was a tougher area in which to drive change, as clinicians spend more time seriously contemplating a head CT than ordering a series of blood tests.
“But I think imaging probably has a bigger impact on patients in a hospital and there are bigger risks typically in performing a CT than there are in taking some blood, to do with radiation, false positives, contrast issues and incidental findings,” he said.
The introduction of a decision-making flow chart helped guide the pulmonary embolism imaging project, which saw a reduction in unnecessary scans from 1815 to 1116 (40%) over 12 months.
This story first appeared in the Choosing Wisely Australia 2018 Annual Report: Conversations for change.
Stewardship toolkit for clinical educators
The Health Resource Stewardship for Clinical educators contains educational material about the Choosing Wisely initiative for use in universities, hospitals and health professional colleges
5 questions to ask your doctor or other healthcare provider to make sure you end up with the right amount of care.